HCM5001 Fundamentals of Health and Care Finance Assignment
Assignment Task
Task 1
A)
Recent developments in the financial and legal environment of social care service
delivery
Financial environment:
Due to changes in financial
needs, market dynamics and financial crisis, there is a continuous evolution of
financial regulation which as follows:
Health and care Act: On 21 July 2021, New Health and care
Bill was enacted with the aim of improving care facilities for all. The bill aims at raising 36 billion pound in
upcoming three years through taxes (Department of Health and Social care. 2025). This will help in overcoming the long term
financial challenges and provides supports in offering effective services to the
patients. In this regard, Government will increase taxes by 1.25% which further
used for providing healthcare services to the patients (Health and Social Care Levy, 2024).
Capping adult care cost: For Increasing health and social
care access, UK government
has introduced a capping amount of 86000 pound that will be provided by the government
to an individual within his lifetime
(Adult Social care charging reform. 2025). This limit is further increased to 100000 pound due to the inflation
and changing market dynamics. This capping of cost assists people in facing
unpredictable scenarios and paying out care cost easily.
Build Back Better plan: In the year of 2023, new health and social
care levy plan or Build Back Heath plan has been introduced with the aim of
deliver quality care to the large number of patients (Build Back health Plan UK. 2025). Under this plan,
individuals with the assets of less than worth 20000 pound will be provided with
the maximum care by local authority and they don’t need to make any expense
from their saving. Further, patients belonging to income group of 20000 pound
to 100000 pound will be provided some mean tested support but other expenses
need to bear by themselves. This will help in reducing financial burden on citizens and support in
enhancing their overall purchasing power. This plan also
emphasis over developing required information which support in improving
overall quality of care.
Legal environment:
There are large numbers of regulation and
legislation that are introduced with the aim of protecting overall welfare of
the patients within healthcare sector. MHRA was developed after the merger of Medical Devices
Agency (MDA) and Medicine Control Agency (MCA) in year 2003. Medicine and healthcare Products Regulatory
Agency (MHRA) are involved towards establishing a code of conduct that aids in
protecting public and supports in maintaining their confidence within the
healthcare services. In this context, regulatory department is also involved
towards maintaining professional register which ensures that all the workers
comprised of required skills and knowledge. Following are various new legal developments that are
initiated within Healthcare sector:
Health and Social care Act 2022: The new health and social care Act was introduced with the aim of
ensuring that all the activities are initiated in a fair manner. Under this
act, NHS work together with the local government which remove requirement of
fully integrated system and aids in offering high quality care (Health and social care Act
2022, 2024). This act also reduces Bureaucracy which aids in taking the sensible
and quick decision. Further,
an adequate accountability system was established to boost the responsive of
healthcare organization and staff. Under
this, new integrated care system was introduced in recent time that offers
patient centred care.
Care Quality Commission’s fundamental Standard (CQC): In the recent times, use of telemedicine has
been increased drastically due to which CQC standards has been established (Evans et al, 2021).
This regulation aims at
managing integrity, ethics, fairness and safety of patients while offering care
through technology. This standard
provides all the guidelines and standards that healthcare providers need to
follow while delivering services through telemedicine and physical manner. In the current time, new strategies
have been initiated in which Quality and Risk Profile (QRP) has been launched
which is software for recording all materialistic information an offering high
quality services.
B)
Alternative funding in Health and social care
sector
Funding is the
crucial requirement of each sector as it aids in seamlessly carrying out all
the process and support in attaining overall goals and objective of the
business entity. There are three alternative funding options that include
Government grants, Private Finance initiatives and agency partnership (Overland and Sovacool, 2020). Private finance
initiatives (PFI) are various investors who involved towards offering funding
for the larger number of healthcare activities. This organization invests with the
aim of earning enough return by offering high quality services. Many
organization within the healthcare sector opted for such funding which helps in
sourcing funds easily without any type of obstacle. However, this type of funding generally increases the cost of
services which ultimately reduces accessibility and affordability for the various
income group.
Along with this,
government grants are another significant funding method in health and social
care sectors. Under this, government provides effective funding to the organization
for offering services at minimal cost which helps in enhancing care access to the larger
patients (Fisk, Livingstone and Pit, 2020). Moreover, health organizations that are funded by the government also
provided with the tax reliefs. Consequently, it helps firm in managing the overall
service cost and supports in offering treatment to the larger segment. On the other hand, this type of funding may not be effectively used within health organization that influences the overall
quality of the services (Nyashanu, Pfende and
Ekpenyong, 2020). Along with this, government has also established a Social Health Insurance
(SHI) scheme in which both employees and workers contribute towards health
funding which used to cover the various cost. This scheme supports in enhancing overall quality of life by
offering access to all the required services. However, this scheme includes
high administrative cost and inability in cover wider population.
Lastly, agency
partnership is the third significant method for the healthcare findings. In
this various healthcare organization form joint ventures, strategic alliances
or contractual agreement with the aim of sharing risk and pool all the
resources (Alderwick et al, 2021). This funding agreement helps in fulfilling the funds requirement effectively
and supports in offering high quality services to the patients. On
the other hand, there is high scope of conflicts between both organization due
to the difference in goals and objective that could impact the overall quality
of service.
After critically evaluating all the three
type of funding alternative, it has
been identified that Government grants is one of the
most significant method for the working of healthcare sector. It has been
identified that private investor generally aims at earning higher amount of
profit due to which healthcare services
are offer at higher cost which could not be afforded by
large number patients (Alsaifi, Elnahass and Salama,
2020). Further, treatment is necessary requirement of
each individual that should be offered at
reasonable cost which could be done with only government grants and funds. If a healthcare organization opted for
government grant, than it generally loses its autonomy and need to work according
to the government policies. In this entity should critically evaluate all the
new rules and regulation which aids in easy alignment.
Task 2
A)
Return on equity
Return
on equity ratio of SPIRE healthcare group ltd for the year ending on 2021 and 2022
as follows.
|
Particulars |
Formula |
2022 |
2021 |
|
Profit |
|
8.2 |
-8.9 |
|
Total revenue |
|
1198.5 |
1106.2 |
|
NP ratio |
Net profit / sales * 100 |
1% |
-1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder's equity |
|
725.1 |
704.8 |
|
Total assets |
|
2159.8 |
2237.4 |
|
Equity Multiplier |
Total assets/Total Equity |
2.98 |
3.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
1198.5 |
1106.2 |
|
Total assets |
|
2198.6 |
2237.4 |
|
Asset Turnover |
Total Revenue/Total assets |
0.55 |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE |
Net profit margin*Asset turnover*Equity Multiplier |
1.11% |
-1.26% |
On
the basis of above table, it has been identified that firm is not having
adequate ROE which denotes firm’s inefficiency in generating adequate return.
Moreover, organization did not attain or near the industry average of 3.70%
which in turn indicates inefficiency in managing the overall trust and
confidence of the shareholders. This situation has arrived as firm incur loss
in the year of 2021 which creates issue in paying out all the expenses.
However, in the next year entity is able to increase its profit and assets
turnover rate which leads positive ROE. This indicates lower profitability position of the business
entity that creates issue in maintaining long term stability. It also indicates
that firm is not effectively utilizing its resources which result in poor
financial position.
Du point analysis
Du point
analysis implies to the financial ratio which is used for evaluating firm’s
overall performance. This analysis has been majorly used by the financial
advisors, investors and financial managers for gaining insight of firm’s capital
structure and factor that contributed towards ROE. This analysis method has
been breaks down into three crucial components that include profits margin,
leverage and assets turnover (Hanson et al, 2022). This analysis method helps in providing comprehensive information
regarding ROE which aids in determining the overall sources of profitability
and inefficiencies. This method facilitates towards describing all the
strengths and weaknesses of the business entity based on which the most
accurate decision are initiated (AÇIKGÖZ and KILIÇ, 2021). Moreover, this analysis method facilitates prominent comparison of
financial performance of company with its competitors which eventually helps
investors in taking the most accurate decision.
B)
Description of NPV and IRR
Net present
value (NPV): This capital budgeting method depicts difference in the present
value of cash inflow and outflow over the specific period of time (McKinley et al, 2020). It is the most
significant method which presents solution by taking into account the time value of money
concept that aids in identifying actual monetary benefit in the upcoming time (Shou, T., 2022). However, this method does not consider project size and ROI while
taking decision.
IRR (Internal
Rate of return): It is another method which helps in
determining overall profitability of the potential investment (Hughes et al, 2021). This method also
includes time value & money and could be calculated without referring the cost
of capital (Yan and Zhang, 2022). However, this method
also ignores crucial factors such as size, future cost and project duration.
In the present
case, there are two investment opportunity available to Spire Healthcare Group
Plc. For identifying the profitability of both the cases, NPV and IRR have been
calculated based on which accurate decision will be taken:
NPV
assessment
|
|
|
Project 1 |
Project 2 |
||
|
Year |
PV factor @ 10% |
Cash inflows (in £) |
Discounted cash inflows (in £) |
Cash inflows (in £) |
Discounted cash inflows (in £) |
|
1 |
0.909 |
140000 |
127273 |
120000 |
109091 |
|
2 |
0.826 |
165000 |
136364 |
150000 |
123967 |
|
3 |
0.751 |
195000 |
146506 |
165000 |
123967 |
|
4 |
0.683 |
210000 |
143433 |
170000 |
116112 |
|
5 |
0.621 |
240000 |
149021 |
180000 |
111766 |
|
Total discounted cash inflow |
|
|
702597 |
|
584903 |
|
Initial investment |
|
|
610000 |
|
515000 |
|
NPV (Total discounted cash inflows - initial investment) |
|
|
92597 |
|
69903 |
IRR
|
Year |
Cash inflows (in £) Project: 1 |
Cash inflows (in £) Project: 2 |
|
0 |
-610000 |
-515000 |
|
1 |
140000 |
120000 |
|
2 |
165000 |
150000 |
|
3 |
195000 |
165000 |
|
4 |
210000 |
170000 |
|
5 |
240000 |
180000 |
|
Internal rate of return (IRR) |
15% |
15% |
From the above
analysis, it has been identified that NPV of project one is higher and there is
no significant difference in the IRR rate of both the options. High NPV
indicates high profitability potential of the investment due to which
investment one will be selected. Project
1 should be selected as it indicates that investor is going to earn higher
return on this investment that support in optimum utilization of the funds. The
above depicted table shows that business entity will get 92597 GBP by making investment in project one. Referring overall evaluation, it can be stated that
project one will prove to be more beneficial and profitable for the firm.
Task 3
A)
Define process of developing financial statements
Financial
statement implies for the formal record of all the financial activities of the
organization which aids in identifying its overall position. It is the most
crucial requirement of each business entity to prepare such statements as it
aids in summarizing the financial transaction, health and overall performance
of entity over the specific period. There are diverse step that an organization
follows for developing financial statement effectively which are as follows:
(Source: Six Section of
accounting cycle. 2024)
Bookkeeping: The financial statement development process begins with the booking
process in which all the transaction is written without any specific format (Marufu et al, 2021). This step is undertaken with the aim of
effectively written down all the crucial information.
Entry of
financial information: After bookkeeping all
the details regarding payment, receipt and other transaction are entered into
the accounting system from which necessary journal entries are entered. On the basis of double entry book system,
ledger accounts are developed by
the accounting system.
Trail balance: For verifying the ledger balances, trial balances are prepared at
the end of each year. Moreover, focus is paid over determining exceptional
items, suspense account and posting year end journals entries.
Income statement: After the preparation of trial balance, emphasis is laid over the
development of income statement which summaries the overall revenue, expenses,
profits and loss of the firm (Patricios et al, 2023). It is the crucial aspect which reveals the firm’s financial
position by describing its over net and gross profit. In the healthcare sector,
accrual accounting has been followed which helps in identifying profits without
paying or receiving all the cash.
Preparation of
Balance sheet: After income statement,
financial manager is involved towards preparing balance sheet which contributes
in describing the overall assets, equity and liabilities of the business
entity. Equity section defines all the shareholders and reserve of the company,
assets includes building, accounts receivable and other equipment that are owned by the entity (Dost et al, 2020). Along with this,
it also includes liability section which denotes all the debts and obligations
of the business entity. Total balance of assets, liability and equity play a
crucial role in estimating the firm’s position based on which major decision
are taken by all the stakeholders.
Development of
cash flow statement: Lastly, for identifying
overall cash inflow and outflow of the business entity, cash flow statements
are prepared by the financial manager (Kolisnyk and Shatskov, 2024). This includes
determining all the cash inflow from insurance reimbursements, investments and
patient’s payments which assist in identifying overall cash flow position of
business entity based on which decision are taken. This statement is developed
on the basis of income statement and balance sheet due to which it is prepared
in last.
B)
Identify Debt ratio and include statement on solvency of firm
For determining
overall solvency position of the SPIRE healthcare group ltd, Debt equity ratio
and debt ratio has been calculated below:
|
Solvency
ratio analysis |
|||
|
Particular
|
formula |
2022 |
2021 |
|
Total debt |
|
1434.7 |
1532.6 |
|
Total assets |
|
2159.8 |
2237.4 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
1095.1 |
1172.8 |
|
Shareholder's equity |
|
1205.6 |
1206.1 |
|
Debt-equity ratio |
Long-term debt / shareholders equity |
0.91 |
0.97 |
|
Debt ratio |
Total debt/total assets |
0.66 |
0.68 |
|
Equity ratio |
Total equity/Total assets |
0.55 |
0.53 |
By doing evaluation, it has been found that
there is no significant change in the debt ratio of firm in the two consecutive
years. This indicates that firm is utilizing effective strategies that assist
in maintaining the overall solvency position in the two years. It has been identified that
debt ratio of organization is also
very high which indicates huge amount of risk for the
business entity. It has been determined that industry
average should be 0.18 which firm
failed to attain. Moreover, high ratio indicates that
firm is excessively depending overall debt to fund assets which creates issue
in attracting new investors and shareholders (Kyere and Ausloos, 2021). On the other hand, on the basis of
Modigliani- Miller Theorem, it has determined that capital structure does not
have any significant impact on overall performance of the business entity. From
this theory, firm should not faced issue in raising funds as firm could earn
higher amount of profit with current capital structure that could be used for
providing effective returns.
For identifying overall solvency position of firm, debt-equity ratio has been calculated. In year 2021 firm’s debt equity ratio was higher than 2022 which indicates that organization is having the high amount of debt. However, firm has decided to reduce the overall debt with the aim of managing its financial risk and gaining the trust of investors and other stakeholders (Roszkowska, 2021). The current debt equity ratio is also very high that accounted for 0.91 respectively which create issues in gaining the trust of investors and could leads to develop issue in sourcing funds in future easily. From the above analysis, it has been stated that firm is not having effective solvency position as it faced issues in attaining the ideal ratio and also have huge financial risk which indicates issue in effectively paying out all long term obligation in upcoming time. It has identified that firm’s equity ratio is increasing that denotes lower financial risk of the business entity. This situation aids in attracting large number of investors which support in easily fulfilling funds requirement.
Read Our Last Article:
C)
Appraisal the role of traditional finance function within healthcare
organization
Traditional
finance function is concern with the process of procuring fund and financing
overall expansion and diversification activities of business entity.
Traditional finance function is not the part of regular managerial process and
only initiated at the time of sourcing funds. In traditional finance function,
individual involved in decision making process were given less importance and
focus was only paid towards outsiders (De Villiers and Sharma, 2020). Further, finance
function was only related to sourcing long term fund and no concern was paid over concept of
working capital. Beside this, the traditional finance function concentrated
more over descriptive decision making and ignore analytical decision making.
Following are the various role of traditional finance function in the overall
working of the healthcare organization:
Formulate
effective budgeting: In the past finance
function, traditional approach of budgeting has been used that helps in
allocating monetary sources for each activity effectively. In this context,
managers are involved toward formulating budget on the basis of previous year while
considered inflation which facilitates effective allocation of funds (Morais, Kakabadse and Kakabadse 2020). This helps
healthcare organization in receiving adequate funds for purchasing all the new
technology that aids in enhancing overall efficiency of healthcare delivery.
This budgeting method also supports optimum utilization of funds by adequately
allocating resources and managing finances of the business entity.
Financial
reporting: Finance function of organization
also includes financial reporting which aids in optimum utilization of funds.
This reporting assists in gaining the trust of investor by providing accurate
information regarding the fund utilization leading to avoiding frauds. Due to the
necessity of financial reporting, healthcare organisations are involved in
utilizing all the funds adequately that ends up providing effective healthcare
services.
Cost control: Another significant role of traditional finance function is to
control overall cost of the healthcare organization that aids in carrying out
all the activities in an effective and efficient manner (Jusoh et al, 2022). In this, manager uses
proactive approach which aims at ensuring that all the resources are
effectively utilized that aids in minimizing unnecessary cost. This helps
healthcare organization in offering services at reasonable cost which
ultimately enhances the access of large number of patients.
Formulate
investment strategies: Financial function of
the organization is also concerned over carefully evaluating all the potential
and available investment opportunities. Based on the analysis, the most
adequate investment options are selected which helps firm in earning higher
return. Due to the increase in the firm's
earning it
helps in providing
high quality services and treatment to the patients.
Effective decision: Finance function
of the organization also plays a crucial role in taking the most effective decision. This function is
involved towards drafting of financial statement which provides information
regarding the overall profitability, liquidity and solvency position of
business entity based on which the most accurate decision are taken by the
manager (Alkaraan et al, 2022). This also assists organization in identifying all the available
risk and opportunities based on which optimum decisions are taken.
Assists in
maintaining regulatory compliance: Finance
function also plays a crucial role in avoiding legal obligation as this department is
involved towards carefully evaluating all the regulation based on which
accurate decision are taken on timely basis (Collins et al, 2024). Further, this function also concentrate over upgrading
infrastructure and acquiring latest equipment which assist in promoting
sustainability and growth of healthcare organization.
However, Traditional finance function does not include automation rather based on manual process which increases scope of error and inefficiency. Moreover, this finance function is not capable in addressing concern related to expected return which impact on overall financial performance. Along with this, traditional method does not emphasis over long term finance management rather focuses on short win which impact on overall functioning.
Books and
Journals
AÇIKGÖZ, T. and KILIÇ, G., (2021).
Investigation of Financial Performance and Market Value of Technology Firms
With Dupont-Regression Analysis. Journal of Accounting &
Finance/Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (90).
Alderwick, H., Hutchings, A.,
Briggs, A. and Mays, N., (2021). The impacts of collaboration between local
health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they
work: a systematic review of reviews. BMC public health, 21,
pp.1-16.
Alkaraan, F., Albitar, K.,
Hussainey, K. and Venkatesh, V.G., (2022). Corporate transformation toward
Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social,
and governance (ESG). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175,
p.121423.
Alsaifi, K., Elnahass, M. and
Salama, A., (2020). Carbon disclosure and financial performance: UK
environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2),
pp.711-726.
Collins, G.S., Moons, K.G., Dhiman, P.,
Riley, R.D., Beam, A.L., Van Calster, B., Ghassemi, M., Liu, X., Reitsma, J.B.,
Van Smeden, M. and Boulesteix, A.L., (2024). TRIPOD+ AI statement: updated
guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or
machine learning methods. bmj, 385.
De Villiers, C. and Sharma,
U., (2020). A critical reflection on the future of financial, intellectual
capital, sustainability and integrated reporting. Critical perspectives
on accounting, 70, p.101999.
Dost, S., Hossain, A.,
Shehab, M., Abdelwahed, A. and Al-Nusair, L., (2020). Perceptions of medical
students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national
cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ open, 10(11),
p.e042378.
Evans, L., Rhodes, A.,
Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C.M., French, C., Machado, F.R.,
Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H.C. and Schorr, C., (2021). Surviving
sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic
shock 2021. Critical care medicine, 49(11),
pp.e1063-e1143.
Farooq, I. and Ali, S., (2020).
COVID-19 outbreak and its monetary implications for dental practices, hospitals
and healthcare workers. Postgraduate medical journal, 96(1142),
p.791.
Fisk, M., Livingstone, A. and
Pit, S.W., (2020). Telehealth in the context of COVID-19: changing perspectives
in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Journal of
medical Internet research, 22(6), p.e19264.
Hanson, K., Brikci, N.,
Erlangga, D., Alebachew, A., De Allegri, M., Balabanova, D., Blecher, M.,
Cashin, C., Esperato, A., Hipgrave, D. and Kalisa, I., (2022). The Lancet Global
Health Commission on financing primary health care: putting people at the
centre. The Lancet Global Health, 10(5), pp.e715-e772.
Hughes, K., Ford, K., Bellis,
M.A., Glendinning, F., Harrison, E. and Passmore, J., (2021). Health and
financial costs of adverse childhood experiences in 28 European countries: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 6(11),
pp.e848-e857.
Jusoh, Y.H.M., Abd Razak,
S.N.A., Noor, W.N.B.W.M., Hudayati, A., Puspaningsih, A. and Nadzri, F.A.A., (2022).
Audit committee characteristics and timeliness of financial reporting: Social
enterprises evidence. Contemporary Economics, 16(2),
p.211.
Kolisnyk, O. and Shatskov,
V., (2024). Financial statement audit: strategy, plan, procedures and
methods. Ekonomichnyy analiz, 34(1), pp.226-235.
Kyere, M. and Ausloos, M., (2021).
Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United
Kingdom. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2),
pp.1871-1885.
Marufu, T.C., Collins, A.,
Vargas, L., Gillespie, L. and Almghairbi, D., (2021). Factors influencing
retention among hospital nurses: systematic review. British Journal of
Nursing, 30(5), pp.302-308.
McKinley, N., McCain, R.S.,
Convie, L., Clarke, M., Dempster, M., Campbell, W.J. and Kirk, S.J., (2020).
Resilience, burnout and coping mechanisms in UK doctors: a cross-sectional
study. BMJ open, 10(1), p.e031765.
Morais, F., Kakabadse, A. and
Kakabadse, N., (2020). Leading through discontinuous change: A typology of
problems and leadership approaches in UK boards. Long Range Planning, 53(2),
p.101870.
Nyashanu, M., Pfende, F. and Ekpenyong, M.,
2020. Exploring the challenges faced by frontline workers in health and social
care amid the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences of frontline workers in the
English Midlands region, UK. Journal of interprofessional care, 34(5),
pp.655-661.
Overland, I. and Sovacool,
B.K., (2020). The misallocation of climate research funding. Energy
Research & Social Science, 62, p.101349.
Patricios, J.S., Schneider,
K.J., Dvorak, J., Ahmed, O.H., Blauwet, C., Cantu, R.C., Davis, G.A.,
Echemendia, R.J., Makdissi, M., McNamee, M. and Broglio, S., (2023). Consensus
statement on concussion in sport: the 6th International Conference on
Concussion in Sport–Amsterdam, October 2022. British journal of sports
medicine, 57(11), pp.695-711.
Roszkowska, P., (2021).
Fintech in financial reporting and audit for fraud prevention and safeguarding
equity investments. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(2),
pp.164-196.
Online
Adult Social care charging reform. 2025. Online. Available through: <
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/build-back-better-our-plan-for-health-and-social-care/adult-social-care-charging-reform-further-details>
Build Back health Plan UK. 2025. Online. Available through: < https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/build-back-better-our-plan-for-health-and-social-care/build-back-better-our-plan-for-health-and-social-care>
Department
of Health and Social care. 2025.
Online. Available through: < https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-of-health-and-social-care
>
Health and social care Act
2022. 2024. Online. Available through: <
https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/projects/health-and-care-act-2022-make-sense-legislation#:~:text=The%202022%20Health%20and%20Care,NHS%20England%20and%20NHS%20Improvement.>
Health and Social Care
Levy. 2024. Online. Available through: < https://www.gov.uk/guidance/prepare-for-the-health-and-social-care-levy#:~:text=From%206%20April%202023,separate%20new%20tax%20of%201.25%25.>
Six
Section of accounting cycle. 2024.
Online. Available through: < https://www.netsuite.com/portal/resource/articles/accounting/accounting-cycle.shtml>
Comments
Post a Comment